
Choose from 5 options:
Evaluations help us to achieve our main goal of helping to protect human health and the environment by providing information and recommendations about managing the risks of industrial chemicals.
Chemicals already available for an industrial use in Australia, or matters related to such chemicals, can be evaluated under AICIS. This includes chemicals that are:
For example, we can evaluate transshipped chemicals. This is despite the fact that they are excluded chemicals and do not need to be categorised.
Evaluations allow us to:
The main reason we will do an evaluation is to protect human health and/or the environment from any risks associated with industrial chemicals. This broad aim covers a range of possible circumstances where an evaluation might be needed. Here are the most likely scenarios.
We will continue to evaluate previously unassessed chemicals that are listed on the Inventory, continuing the work started under the NICNAS IMAP framework.
We will publish a list of planned evaluations under AICIS.
New information can be voluntarily supplied to us. It can also be information that chemical introducers must legally provide (under the terms of an assessment certificate or an Inventory listing).
A new or changed use
A new or changed use for a chemical may lead to more or different human exposure, or more or different release to the environment. This can be from changes in volume, concentration, formulation method or product types, or changes to the method(s) of disposal.
In some circumstances, you may have to apply for a variation to a certificate/authorisation or to the Inventory listing.
New hazard information
New hazard information might include toxicological test data that were not available to us when we previously assessed a chemical. It could also be derived from a workplace incident that showed an adverse effect. New ecotoxicological data might suggest that there are new or changed environmental consequences of the chemical’s use.
This information may indicate that current known exposure can lead to greater risk than previously determined and we may decide to do an evaluation.
New information or requests from risk managers
A risk manager might report the following new information to us:
the identification of nanoforms of a chemical, for which the hazards or behaviour are not well characterised
health effects from consumer products that can be linked to a common chemical ingredient, such as allergic reactions associated with a particular preservative
environmental contamination
In these circumstances, we may decide to do an evaluation.
New information from international regulators
An international regulator might tell us that a chemical is now banned or restricted in their country. If the chemical can be introduced in Australia without comparable controls, we may do an evaluation to consider the risks and determine appropriate controls.
A diverse range of information is required to produce robust evaluations. These data include hazard characteristics and potential exposure to humans and the environment. In most cases, this information will describe:
We will draw on a range of publicly available sources for evaluations including:
Our post-market monitoring activities will help us identify whether we need to evaluate a potential risk relating to a chemical introduction.
We will do an evaluation if we find a mistake in the identity of a chemical listed on the Inventory. We do this to address any concern about chemical risks arising from the mistake. The evaluation means we can correct any misidentification and remove the wrongly listed chemical. We can then add the correct chemical to the Inventory, provided the risks of the chemical introduction are manageable.
We will send a notice to each certificate holder that states the reason(s) for the evaluation and the time period for it.
While we do the evaluation, your certificate authorisation does not change. In other words, you can still introduce the chemical. We will consult with you if we are considering the need to change your authorisation to continue introducing. This might be, for example, to add a condition to a certificate.
These type of evaluations include chemicals that are:
We will publish a website notice about the evaluation with details of the:
If this evaluation is part of our ongoing evaluations work, it will also be on our evaluations list.
Existing authorisations are not affected/do not change while we do our evaluation. For example, you can continue introducing by meeting the current Exempted criteria.
We will consult stakeholders if we are considering the need to change the regulatory approach to a chemical. For example, a change might include adding a condition to an Inventory listing.
We consult during evaluations to get feedback from stakeholders and the public on:
Consultation is also an opportunity for anyone to give us new information about the subject of the evaluation.
We consult publicly on evaluations except for chemicals under a current certificate.
Consultation is critical. We will ask for feedback from industry and the general public.
Public consultation can occur:
We will consult with certificate holders when our draft evaluation statement is ready. We will send the draft evaluation statement to each certificate holder. You will have at least 20 working days to provide a written response.
During an evaluation, we may consult with 'prescribed bodies'. These are generally Australian standard-setting bodies and/or state and territory risk-management agencies. We will most likely do this if we are considering recommending a change to the regulatory status of a chemical, such as
These usually apply to evaluations of chemicals other than those solely covered by assessment certificate(s).
Most of the time, we can finish an evaluation with the information we already have or information obtained through consulting.
We may initiate a voluntary call for information if we need more targeted information and if we think it will help to ensure the evaluation’s quality and accuracy. We will make these requests during the course of an evaluation.
We may send calls for information to specific stakeholder(s) such as introducers of a particular chemical and industry sector(s) that represent particular uses.
For chemicals under certificate, we usually send an information request to a holder of, or a person covered by, an assessment certificate. These requests may be mandatory.
We will publish voluntary calls for information notices on our website, including details of the information we need. The time frame to respond will be at least 20 working days.
If we think a stakeholder has the information we need for an evaluation, we can issue a mandatory call for information. Our legislation only permits us to make a mandatory call for information if:
We can make a mandatory call for information to introducers of a chemical during the previous 12 months or in the next 12 months and other people we believe have information relevant to the evaluation.
For an evaluation of a chemical under a current certificate, we can make a mandatory call for information by written notice to any holder of, or person covered by, the certificate.
We will make a mandatory call for information during the course of an evaluation if needed. The time frame to respond will be at least 20 working days.
Penalties apply if you receive a mandatory notice and do not provide the information in the time stipulated.
We had similar powers to make a mandatory call for information under our previous legislation. We rarely used that power, and expect that we will rarely use mandatory calls for information under our new legislation.
We will make a mandatory call for information if we think we can obtain information that will:
Information we call for can be used to identify:
We can also make calls for information about newly identified hazards or sources of exposure when there is limited reference material available. In this case, we will need to gather more current and up-to-date information about real-time use and effects.
Calls for information will not mean anyone has to conduct more tests or otherwise generate additional data. They will request or require information that is already available or easily accessed.
When you send us information in response to a consultation or call for information, you can flag it as confidential. To do this you must submit a form and nominate a contact person. We will then treat this information as confidential. If we need to publish the information that you have flagged as confidential (for example, in an evaluation statement), we will send a notice to the nominated contact person. The notice will outline our intent to publish the information and provide information holder an opportunity to formally apply for protection of the information as 'confidential business information' (CBI). If we approve your CBI application, your information becomes 'protected information'. We are not allowed to disclose it except in certain defined circumstances, with penalties for unauthorised disclosure.
If a chemical’s identity and/or end use are already protected as the result of a previous approved application for CBI, then we must not disclose the protected information in the course of an evaluation. This means that only the AICIS Approved Chemical Name (AACN) and/or generalised end use would be published .
The possible outcomes following publication of an evaluation statement are:
We must publish all evaluation statements on our website at the end of an evaluation. They summarise our conclusions about any risks posed by the chemical and any recommendations (if applicable) to control those risks.
See our risk management recommendations register
An evaluation statement’s purpose is to provide introducers and the public with concise information about any identified risks and the means of managing those risks.
Risk recommendations can include recommendations to risk-management agencies, such as national standard-setting bodies and/or state and territory risk managers. If the evaluation concludes that regulatory changes under AICIS’s legislation are required to control the risk(s), this may lead to one of the further outcomes set out below.
For chemicals that are listed on the Inventory, evaluation statements will be linked to the corresponding Inventory listing. For chemicals under certificate, the evaluation statement will be linked to the corresponding assessment statement.
An evaluation statement can recommend that we vary a term of assessment certificate. This could be a variation to:
Alternatively, an evaluation statement can recommend that we cancel an assessment certificate.
The statutory safeguards we must meet before we can vary or cancel a certificate are:
Any decision to vary an assessment certificate is reviewable under our legislation.
An evaluation statement can recommend that we vary a term of an Inventory listing, which could be a variation to the:
Alternatively, an evaluation statement can recommend that we remove a listing from the Inventory.
The statutory safeguards that must be satisfied before we can vary or remove an Inventory listing are:
A previously regulated chemical is a chemical that was previously regulated under another Commonwealth law. Under our legislation, we can transfer these chemicals to our Inventory. This process might happen because of a government decision to move regulatory responsibility for a set of chemicals to us.
For example, in the past we have added to our Inventory chemicals that are ingredients of products that were previously regulated as therapeutic goods, where a government decision was made to change the regulatory regime for those products.
The statutory requirements for this power to be exercised are:
We can add a chemical to the Inventory to replace a chemical that was misidentified. That is, to correct a mistake in chemical identity in a current Inventory listing.
While there is no application process for this, we may conduct an evaluation of a potential misidentification based on information we receive from industry or the public.
The legislation requires:
We will only review CBI if a completed evaluation recommends it is necessary because there may be public interest in disclosing the CBI. If this happens, the CBI will be subject to a re-application of the statutory test for CBI protection.